Enterprise Architecture Repository

EA/CMDB — Enterprise Architecture with unmatched business depth.

EA/CMDB is the native EA Repository for the Clara/EA framework. Unique in the market in combining a complete business hierarchy — Market → Niche → Brand → Legal Vehicle → Product → Channel — with a high-performance native graph, automatic infrastructure discovery, and LLM-powered IaC generation. Positioned as an enterprise-grade alternative to LeanIX, Ardoq, and Alfabet, anchored by an open-source edition.

What it is

EA Repository, not operational CMDB.

Operational CMDBs — ServiceNow, BMC, Device42 — were born for ITSM: incident, change, technical inventory. They serve the help desk, the NOC, the change manager. They answer "is this server up?".

EA Repositories — LeanIX, Ardoq, Alfabet, Mega HOPEX — were born for enterprise architecture and strategic decisions. They serve the enterprise architect, the CTO, the CIO. They answer "what capabilities support this business product?".

EA/CMDB belongs to the second segment — and goes further: it is an EA Repository with deeper business hierarchy than any competitor, with automatic infrastructure discovery that no traditional EA tool delivers, and with LLM-powered IaC generation that no competitor even plans.

"EA/CMDB models the business itself across its entire value hierarchy — connecting technology to the top of the pyramid. Not a difference of degree. A difference of category.
Dimension Operational CMDB EA Repository (EA/CMDB)
Focus IT operations (ITSM) Enterprise architecture and strategic decisions
Primary user Help desk, NOC, Change Manager Enterprise Architect, CTO, CIO, Strategy
Central question "Is this server up?" "Which capabilities support this business product?"
Data model Technical CIs (server, network, software) Business Capability, Application, Legal Entity, Market
Horizon Present / operational Present + future (roadmap, target-state)
Examples ServiceNow, BMC Helix, Device42 LeanIX, Ardoq, Alfabet, Mega HOPEX, EA/CMDB

Capabilities

Where EA/CMDB is unbeatable

Six capabilities that, combined, exist in no EA Repository on the market. No competitor delivers this set — and several of them, individually, are unique in the global segment.

I

Clara/EA hierarchy — 12 layers

Market → Segment → Niche → Brand → Legal Vehicle → Product → Channel → Modality, connected as first-class graph entities. No one descends to that level: LeanIX and Alfabet stop at Business Capability. The only platform to model the business itself across its entire value hierarchy.

II

Native graph (ArangoDB)

Native graph database — not emulated via foreign keys. 29 typed edge types, multiple named graphs, multi-hop traversal in AQL. Only Ardoq uses a native graph among competitors — without our depth of business model.

III

Automatic IaC discovery

Native Terraform HCL parser, Kubernetes manifest ingestion, Entra ID/LDAP sync, AWS/GCP cost ingestion. For teams living in IaC, it eliminates the chronic staleness of EA tools — the repository updates itself. Nonexistent in LeanIX, Alfabet, Ardoq.

IV

IaC Generation via LLM

The only EA Repository on the market that executes: it generates Terraform and Ansible from the modeled inventory. The architect designs the platform → the system produces IaC ready for review and apply. End of the "documentation → manual implementation" cycle. No global parallel.

V

End-to-end FinOps

Cloud cost distributed across the Clara/EA hierarchy — the only platform able to answer "what is the total AWS cost to sustain the Visa-brand consumer credit card niche?" via graph traversal. Competitors stop at cost per application or per capability.

VI

IPAM, Skills, and Org Snapshots

VPC, subnet, IP allocation, and physical cabling in the same graph as the business architecture. Skills per employee linked to the org chart and inventory. Temporal snapshots of organizational structure. Capabilities traditional EA Repositories consider out of scope — first-class here.

Architecture

Three layers, a single executable graph

1. Model layer

Implements the entire Clara/EA hierarchy as entity and relationship types — Market, Niche, Brand, Legal Vehicle, Product, Channel, Capability, Application, Database, Cloud Resource, IP, Person, Skill. ArangoDB as native graph, AQL for queries.

2. Discovery layer

Workers (Temporal) continuously ingest: Terraform HCL parser, Kubernetes discovery, Entra ID/LDAP sync, AWS/GCP billing ingestion, ITSM sync (GLPI, ServiceNow, Jira). REST API for programmatic feeding. Plugin SDK for custom connectors.

3. Use layer

Query APIs, modular MFEs (Topology, Observability, FinOps, Org Chart), TIME Matrix, Technology Radar, executive dashboards. Worker-iac generates Terraform/Ansible via LLM. Inbound/outbound webhooks, native multi-tenancy, i18n PT-BR / EN / ES.

USO DESCOBERTA MODELO MFEs APIs IaC LLM grafo Clara/EA · ArangoDB Terraform K8s Cloud ITSM framework Clara/EA · 12 camadas

Integrations

Connects to the stack that already exists — and what comes next.

Native connectors for the main sources of truth in modern environments: cloud, IaC, ITSM, identity, repositories. Open Plugin SDK for custom integrations. Certified market connectors on the roadmap.

Cloud
AWS · GCP
IaC
Terraform · Kubernetes
ITSM
GLPI · ServiceNow · Jira
Identity
Entra ID · LDAP · Okta
Repositories
GitHub · GitLab
Observability
Datadog · Dynatrace (roadmap)
Workflow
Temporal · Webhooks
SDK
Plugin SDK aberto

Comparison

EA/CMDB vs. LeanIX, Ardoq, and Alfabet

Direct comparison with the three highest-maturity EA Repositories in the global market. Consolidated score: EA/CMDB 4.2★, above LeanIX (3.7★) and Ardoq (3.9★) on business model depth; below Alfabet (4.4★) on formal EA modeling. Unique differentiators below.

Capability EA/CMDB LeanIX Ardoq Alfabet
Hierarchy Market → Niche → Brand → Legal Vehicle ★★★★★ Unbeatable Não modela Não modela Partial
Native graph (not emulated) ★★★★★ ArangoDB Relational ★★★★★ Yes Relational
Automatic Terraform/K8s discovery ★★★★★ Native No No No
IaC Generation via LLM ★★★★★ Unique No No No
FinOps from cloud to market niche ★★★★★ Unique Per application No Per capability
IPAM + Network Cabling ★★★★★ Unique in segment Out of scope Out of scope Out of scope
Integrated Skills Management ★★★★★ Yes No No Limited
Temporal Org Snapshots ★★★★★ Yes No No Limited
Formal ArchiMate / TOGAF Gap (interop. on roadmap) Partial Partial ★★★★★ Native
Collaborative surveys Gap (P1 roadmap) ★★★★★ Strong ★★★★★ Strong Partial
Open-source enterprise ★★★★★ Unique Proprietary Proprietary Proprietary
Reference annual cost Community free · SaaS from $390/mo $80k–$300k $60k–$200k $150k–$500k

Comparative analysis based on internal market study (Apr/2026). LeanIX (SAP), Ardoq, Alfabet (OpenText/Software AG), and Mega HOPEX are marks of their respective owners. Full comparison (including Mega HOPEX, Bizzdesign, BOC ADOIT, iServer, and Planview) available on request.

Positioning

Where we compete — and where we don't.

Where we win

  • → Companies practicing or wanting to practice the Clara/EA framework
  • → Teams living in IaC (Terraform, Kubernetes) who reject stale EA tools
  • → Brazilian market: financial services, fintechs, digital banks, insurance, telecom
  • → Those needing business depth beyond the standard Application Portfolio
  • → Those wanting enterprise EA without paying $100k–$500k annual license

Onde não competimos (ainda)

  • → Companies requiring ArchiMate/TOGAF as mandatory formal language
  • → Those needing BPMN integrated with EA
  • → Highly regulated sectors requiring formal GRC (SOX, COBIT, BACEN mapping)
  • → Enterprise contracts with 24/7 SLA and contractual premium support

Acknowledged gaps. Public competitive roadmap — ArchiMate interoperability, collaborative surveys, and target-state diff in development.

Next step

See EA/CMDB applied to your context

45-minute session: Clara/EA hierarchy loaded with your vocabulary, discovery running against a sample Terraform, live IaC generation, and the navigable architecture graph. For EA teams, CTOs, and enterprise architects.